History does repeat itself.
Congress and the White House and the general public should consider Rober P. Murphy's book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and the New Deal.
It turns out our schools and the media have been feeding us false information. Hoover was an interventionist. Massive spending by FDR - like Obama is doing now - did not work.
Here's what an Amazon review notes about Murphy's findings:
* The Crash of `29 was caused not by capitalism, but by the boom brought on by the newly created Federal Reserve's easy money policy (sound familiar?)
* Hoover made the Depression "Great" precisely by abandoning the laissez-faire approach that previous presidents had followed and that kept depressions short
* The bank runs of the 1930s were caused by government intervention in the banking system
* Government efforts to prop up wages and prices led to a full decade of double-digit unemployment
* FDR's arbitrary policies toward businessmen resulted in net investment of less than zero for much of the Depression
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
MY response on Seeking Alpha, today, July 8, 2009
Nelson is correct. Both parties are essentially the same. As Larry Bates describes it, one is going towards socialism at 80 miles an hour and the other at 40 miles an hour.
Look at the collectivist response last autumn when the banking system was paretially acquired by the government, which had allowed banks to get too big in the first place.
When George Green, a Republican, was unsuccessfully recruited to be Jimmy Carter's campaign finance chairman for the 1976 campiaign, then Fed Chairman Paul Volcker told Green his party affiliation was irrelevant becaue "we control both political parties."
However, I wonder why the British "commentator" Abrose Evan-Pritchard cites the rise in U. S. militia groups. The U. S. government has always been paranoid that the armed force it uses to install totalitarian governments in other countries might be attempted here. But that is clearly just psychological warfare to make the general public fearful of patriots who love the country more than a world government.
Ambrose-Pritchard and the U. S. public should know by now that Russia and the czar did not fall at the hands of a public militia or even a revolution. The czar was really betrayed by his own Masonic palace guard, such betrayers as General Witte, who later tried to mount a counter revolution and was killed.
While the government tries to stir up the public to fear "militia", which is essentially just a bunch of independent unorganized deer hunters, true American patriots and a few retired generals see the real threat is infiltration and overthrow of a representative government from within the government itself.
It is the increasing realization that the top most levels of the U. S. government seem to reflect values and actions that are un-American that really has the government paranoid. The occupied government fears it has been found out.
Originally, the American people fought against British tyranny. Now, the U. S. government is accused of killing maybe a million women and children in Iraq, a country that never attacked the U. S. and could not if it wanted to. Suddenly the U. S. is kicking around the weak in a country it has no logical reason to be in.
.
Creating a scenario so the government can impose martial control here is always a possibility. The Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, the attack on Fort Sumter are widely acknowledged to have been invited or perhaps even promulgated to create a change in mass consciousness that would support war.
The riots in Seattle during the world trade meet were clearly staged by provocateurs, not the compliant initial protesters.
Which gets us back to the assertion that the two parties are like one party anyway. They are not so much fighting over issues as they are fighting over control of the march toward what George Soros calls "communitarianism." Having made his billions he thinks the rest of us should live under socialist control.
Mexico would appear to be the model. A high per capital ratio of millionaires and an even higher ratio of powerless peasants that can be easily controlled - so long as the American one party system allows the potential extremists in Mexico to be deported to the U. S. to be kept busy and subsidized by the U. S. failing middle class.
Ambrose Evan-Pritchard should be educated enough to know that the overthrow of the Russian czar was implemented from within by the palace guard and elements of the military, the funding and direction of this overthrow came from outside the government, including England and the Fabian socialists.
If a militia ever does really rise up in the U. S., it would not be proactive but simply an attempt to defend the U. S. homeland from a foreign directed takeover. To defend the U. S. from a government that implements control directed from outside this country.
This is such a simple obervation of the true forces that could come into play.
The best solution would be for the federal government to start acting like it represents all the people and is here to serve all the people. Not just repreent the money class, elements of which, are known to have financed the Russian overthrow.
To know history is to understand. Jul 08 11:32 AM
Nelson is correct. Both parties are essentially the same. As Larry Bates describes it, one is going towards socialism at 80 miles an hour and the other at 40 miles an hour.
Look at the collectivist response last autumn when the banking system was paretially acquired by the government, which had allowed banks to get too big in the first place.
When George Green, a Republican, was unsuccessfully recruited to be Jimmy Carter's campaign finance chairman for the 1976 campiaign, then Fed Chairman Paul Volcker told Green his party affiliation was irrelevant becaue "we control both political parties."
However, I wonder why the British "commentator" Abrose Evan-Pritchard cites the rise in U. S. militia groups. The U. S. government has always been paranoid that the armed force it uses to install totalitarian governments in other countries might be attempted here. But that is clearly just psychological warfare to make the general public fearful of patriots who love the country more than a world government.
Ambrose-Pritchard and the U. S. public should know by now that Russia and the czar did not fall at the hands of a public militia or even a revolution. The czar was really betrayed by his own Masonic palace guard, such betrayers as General Witte, who later tried to mount a counter revolution and was killed.
While the government tries to stir up the public to fear "militia", which is essentially just a bunch of independent unorganized deer hunters, true American patriots and a few retired generals see the real threat is infiltration and overthrow of a representative government from within the government itself.
It is the increasing realization that the top most levels of the U. S. government seem to reflect values and actions that are un-American that really has the government paranoid. The occupied government fears it has been found out.
Originally, the American people fought against British tyranny. Now, the U. S. government is accused of killing maybe a million women and children in Iraq, a country that never attacked the U. S. and could not if it wanted to. Suddenly the U. S. is kicking around the weak in a country it has no logical reason to be in.
.
Creating a scenario so the government can impose martial control here is always a possibility. The Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, the attack on Fort Sumter are widely acknowledged to have been invited or perhaps even promulgated to create a change in mass consciousness that would support war.
The riots in Seattle during the world trade meet were clearly staged by provocateurs, not the compliant initial protesters.
Which gets us back to the assertion that the two parties are like one party anyway. They are not so much fighting over issues as they are fighting over control of the march toward what George Soros calls "communitarianism." Having made his billions he thinks the rest of us should live under socialist control.
Mexico would appear to be the model. A high per capital ratio of millionaires and an even higher ratio of powerless peasants that can be easily controlled - so long as the American one party system allows the potential extremists in Mexico to be deported to the U. S. to be kept busy and subsidized by the U. S. failing middle class.
Ambrose Evan-Pritchard should be educated enough to know that the overthrow of the Russian czar was implemented from within by the palace guard and elements of the military, the funding and direction of this overthrow came from outside the government, including England and the Fabian socialists.
If a militia ever does really rise up in the U. S., it would not be proactive but simply an attempt to defend the U. S. homeland from a foreign directed takeover. To defend the U. S. from a government that implements control directed from outside this country.
This is such a simple obervation of the true forces that could come into play.
The best solution would be for the federal government to start acting like it represents all the people and is here to serve all the people. Not just repreent the money class, elements of which, are known to have financed the Russian overthrow.
To know history is to understand. Jul 08 11:32 AM
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Banks should not have played favorites
Free markets in a America is a myth. We have monopolists who are continuously propped up by government support.
A free market America would have let the money center banks go belly up so the free markets could cleanse themselves.
I recall it was the huge banks in Japan that prompted the U. S. to encourage U. S. banks to merge into unmanageable mega-bigness. Didn't Japan experience a still ongoing economic crush despite having megabanks too?
And now free markets simply means U. S. producers and manufacturers should shut down so companies in second and third world labor markets can become the new monopolists.
It was partly the banks that encouraged the huge concentrations in industry after industry because in their thinking it is easier to make one mega loan - and watch it (fail) - than make many smaller loans. But the megalenders have found out the borrowers are now so big the bank now works for them. Think about it. The borrowers can and do just liquidate and walk away.
The banks have to figure out how to get their huge megaloans back. How to get the mega derivatives unwound. How to make one huge loan to a lot of foreign low wage workers they wanted brought in.
When the banks started favoring a few businesses in each industry in order to consolidate them for lending efficiency they started down the free market path that leads to corporate welfare.
A free market America would have let the money center banks go belly up so the free markets could cleanse themselves.
I recall it was the huge banks in Japan that prompted the U. S. to encourage U. S. banks to merge into unmanageable mega-bigness. Didn't Japan experience a still ongoing economic crush despite having megabanks too?
And now free markets simply means U. S. producers and manufacturers should shut down so companies in second and third world labor markets can become the new monopolists.
It was partly the banks that encouraged the huge concentrations in industry after industry because in their thinking it is easier to make one mega loan - and watch it (fail) - than make many smaller loans. But the megalenders have found out the borrowers are now so big the bank now works for them. Think about it. The borrowers can and do just liquidate and walk away.
The banks have to figure out how to get their huge megaloans back. How to get the mega derivatives unwound. How to make one huge loan to a lot of foreign low wage workers they wanted brought in.
When the banks started favoring a few businesses in each industry in order to consolidate them for lending efficiency they started down the free market path that leads to corporate welfare.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Inconsistent Journalism
The misfortune of South Carolina Mark Sanford is a personal tragedy that has been splashed all over the news pages.
Sanford had the misfortune of being in the wrong state at the wrong time.
Not too long ago a sitting governor of Colorado was rumored to have sired one, maybe two, children out of wedlock. This rumor was so pervasive and just under the surface -- but unlike the dramas of Elliot Spitzer or Sanford or several other prominent U. S. senators and candidates, the Colorado story never saw the light of day.
On a Valentine's Day the alternative weekly Westword acknowledged the rumor by printing a humorous speculation on whom the governor's paramor might be. It touched a wide variety of personalities, even male, making the rumor all the more humorous.
But why was it never publicized as was Spitzer and now Sanford and so many others?
The unanswered question was whether one, or maybe two, of the alleged unwed mothers were also state or public employees and if any public money had been involved in any of this.
My source, an officer at the Denver Press Club, said it was two children and that the media had agreed not to run the story in exchange for the governor not running for any office again.
A Republican candidate for the U. S. Senate in Illinois will have his sealed divorce records opened from pressure from the Chicago Tribune. This paved the way for the candidate to step down and give his opponent Barack Obama an easy win.
Politics is a rough and tumble, poltiical life and death spectator sport.
But not in Colorado.
Recently the Rocky Mountain News shuttered its doors. The news staff was put out on the street.
Did Colorado residents become any less informed? Judging from how some people are treated, compared with others around the nation, apparently not.
Sanford had the misfortune of being in the wrong state at the wrong time.
Not too long ago a sitting governor of Colorado was rumored to have sired one, maybe two, children out of wedlock. This rumor was so pervasive and just under the surface -- but unlike the dramas of Elliot Spitzer or Sanford or several other prominent U. S. senators and candidates, the Colorado story never saw the light of day.
On a Valentine's Day the alternative weekly Westword acknowledged the rumor by printing a humorous speculation on whom the governor's paramor might be. It touched a wide variety of personalities, even male, making the rumor all the more humorous.
But why was it never publicized as was Spitzer and now Sanford and so many others?
The unanswered question was whether one, or maybe two, of the alleged unwed mothers were also state or public employees and if any public money had been involved in any of this.
My source, an officer at the Denver Press Club, said it was two children and that the media had agreed not to run the story in exchange for the governor not running for any office again.
A Republican candidate for the U. S. Senate in Illinois will have his sealed divorce records opened from pressure from the Chicago Tribune. This paved the way for the candidate to step down and give his opponent Barack Obama an easy win.
Politics is a rough and tumble, poltiical life and death spectator sport.
But not in Colorado.
Recently the Rocky Mountain News shuttered its doors. The news staff was put out on the street.
Did Colorado residents become any less informed? Judging from how some people are treated, compared with others around the nation, apparently not.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Incompetent Federal Reserve
An open letter to Congress.
The alarm bells are ringing.
Why would the failed Federal Reserve Bank be given broader powers? The Federal Reserve should be abolished, not given broader responsibility.
Years ago Forbes Magazine rightly noted The Fed always targets interest rates either too high or too low, resulting in major damage control measures. Do you like having to bankrupt the U.S. with more and more rescue programs that should have been avoided in the first place?
Recent Holocaust Center visitor von Brunn apparently was set off years ago when he attended a national real estate broker meeting in Washington, D.C. At the meeting, then Fed Chairman Paul Volcker said "You will hate me because tomorrow I am going to bankrupt you."
What kind of enlightened, 21st Century government gives a private bank the power to repeatedly bankrupt its citizens and businesses with artificial business manipulations?
And I again ask why every Fed chairman in my long lifetime has been Jewish. If there has to be a Fed, and there doesn't, why isn't the chairman appointed from a broader gene pool?
The kindly Wikepedia said Arthur Burns, a foreign born Jew, did not know what he was doing and he caused the subsequent runaway inflation of the 1970s.
Home grown Jewish Fed chairman Alan Greenspan told Ron Paul in Congressional testimony that he could not define money and really did not know what it was.
If these people do not know what they are doing, cannot define money, why are they in charge of anything so powerful as a central bank, which again should be abolished.
When George Green was unsuccedssfully recruited to be chairman for the Jimmy Carter presidential campaign, Green told his recruiters, who included Ted Kennedy and Canadian prime minister Trudeau, he was a Republican. Then Fed chairman Paul Volcker told Green his party affiliation was irrelevant because "we control both parties"
Please prove Volcker wrong. Prove you can give back bank donations and do the Andrew Jackson thing and work for a better America.
Do not consider this anti Semtitic because the Semites are the Arabs. Most modern Jews are from a Mongol-Turkish sub tribe that converted around 700 AD while living in their true homeland on the north shore of the Black Sea. Arabs look like Arabs and modern Jews mostly do not, due to genetics, a science that is more knowable than economics.
I have said nothing about Semites, a separate foreign policy issue.
Again, why is the top Fed job immune from affirmative action and picked from such a narrow gene pool? This message had to be blunt because being nice and polite clearly has not worked for Joe Six pack to get his message through to the elites..
Please look at the bigger picture and restore America. Please stop shoving America into a partial world order.
It won't be a New World Order because Russia, China and India have grown a pair and announced central bank economics and the greedy forces behind it are too destructive to serve humanity.
Paul Volcker back then could care less about the economic pain he would cause Americans. Maybe the Fed should be bankrupted so its insulated work force can get a feel for what they have done to so many.Sincerely,
The alarm bells are ringing.
Why would the failed Federal Reserve Bank be given broader powers? The Federal Reserve should be abolished, not given broader responsibility.
Years ago Forbes Magazine rightly noted The Fed always targets interest rates either too high or too low, resulting in major damage control measures. Do you like having to bankrupt the U.S. with more and more rescue programs that should have been avoided in the first place?
Recent Holocaust Center visitor von Brunn apparently was set off years ago when he attended a national real estate broker meeting in Washington, D.C. At the meeting, then Fed Chairman Paul Volcker said "You will hate me because tomorrow I am going to bankrupt you."
What kind of enlightened, 21st Century government gives a private bank the power to repeatedly bankrupt its citizens and businesses with artificial business manipulations?
And I again ask why every Fed chairman in my long lifetime has been Jewish. If there has to be a Fed, and there doesn't, why isn't the chairman appointed from a broader gene pool?
The kindly Wikepedia said Arthur Burns, a foreign born Jew, did not know what he was doing and he caused the subsequent runaway inflation of the 1970s.
Home grown Jewish Fed chairman Alan Greenspan told Ron Paul in Congressional testimony that he could not define money and really did not know what it was.
If these people do not know what they are doing, cannot define money, why are they in charge of anything so powerful as a central bank, which again should be abolished.
When George Green was unsuccedssfully recruited to be chairman for the Jimmy Carter presidential campaign, Green told his recruiters, who included Ted Kennedy and Canadian prime minister Trudeau, he was a Republican. Then Fed chairman Paul Volcker told Green his party affiliation was irrelevant because "we control both parties"
Please prove Volcker wrong. Prove you can give back bank donations and do the Andrew Jackson thing and work for a better America.
Do not consider this anti Semtitic because the Semites are the Arabs. Most modern Jews are from a Mongol-Turkish sub tribe that converted around 700 AD while living in their true homeland on the north shore of the Black Sea. Arabs look like Arabs and modern Jews mostly do not, due to genetics, a science that is more knowable than economics.
I have said nothing about Semites, a separate foreign policy issue.
Again, why is the top Fed job immune from affirmative action and picked from such a narrow gene pool? This message had to be blunt because being nice and polite clearly has not worked for Joe Six pack to get his message through to the elites..
Please look at the bigger picture and restore America. Please stop shoving America into a partial world order.
It won't be a New World Order because Russia, China and India have grown a pair and announced central bank economics and the greedy forces behind it are too destructive to serve humanity.
Paul Volcker back then could care less about the economic pain he would cause Americans. Maybe the Fed should be bankrupted so its insulated work force can get a feel for what they have done to so many.Sincerely,
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Watching Ben Bernanke today reminded me of the terrible damage the privately owned Federal Reserve has again inflicted on the American people.
This privately owned bank's latest fiasco has done more damage to this nation than Russia and China could accomplish by direct bombing.
Congress and the President have forgotten that just four or five years ago Alan Greenspan and then Bernanke began jacking up interest rates to accomplish what we are seeing - the puncture of an economic bubble the Fed created in the first place. This time the damage was so sudden and widespread the Fed had to backtrack - but it was too late. And now we're in a hell of a mess.
The Fed is primarily an agent for inflating money supply so that wage earners can keep up with usurious interest charges used to keep the people in bondage. The Fed has lowered the value of the 1913 dollar to just a nickle today.
The Fed is a mistake and it should be abolished. Congress has the authority to regulate money in a more honest fashion to promote a stable economy.
Forbes magazine more than 20 years ago noted the Fed is continuously guilty of excessive expansion and then contractions. The primary beneficiaries of these manipulations are the investment bankers who can sell stock they don't own going up and then pocket more profits by selling stock they don't own as prices go down.
I realize the danger you all face in Congress for resisting the Federal bank cartel. The czar was taken out, in part, because he resisted a central bank for Russian. So Russia got centralized everything as punishment. But if you all hang together, you will not hang. They will crawl back under the rocks from which they came.
Hopefully on the north shore of the Black Sea, but Russia will not take them back. I also point out that every Fed chairman in my long lifetime has been a Khazar, confounding the ethnic distribution pattern of even the white Wasp network.
Pushiness does not relate to integrity and true managerial ability and serving the broader public interest. Before you all rush to praise the Fed as a hero, I challenge you to abolish this enemy of the people before it kills the nation - and your anticipated pensions too.
If Congress truly wants to see a prosperous United States, and not just a component of an unmanageably large and unsustainable world government, I urge itto be intellectually honest and kill this beast spawned in secret on Jekyll Island by robber barons whose robbing and pillaging has gone on long enough.
Congressman Grayson was questioning a Fed Reserve woman a few days ago and she had no idea where the money went.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, and American leadership has been asleep for too long. I read the executive branch study a few years ago - was it LBJ - that stated a strong economy is a major component of national security. The central bank has weakened us once again. Andrew Jackson is rolling in his grave at Hermitage, Tennessee.
This privately owned bank's latest fiasco has done more damage to this nation than Russia and China could accomplish by direct bombing.
Congress and the President have forgotten that just four or five years ago Alan Greenspan and then Bernanke began jacking up interest rates to accomplish what we are seeing - the puncture of an economic bubble the Fed created in the first place. This time the damage was so sudden and widespread the Fed had to backtrack - but it was too late. And now we're in a hell of a mess.
The Fed is primarily an agent for inflating money supply so that wage earners can keep up with usurious interest charges used to keep the people in bondage. The Fed has lowered the value of the 1913 dollar to just a nickle today.
The Fed is a mistake and it should be abolished. Congress has the authority to regulate money in a more honest fashion to promote a stable economy.
Forbes magazine more than 20 years ago noted the Fed is continuously guilty of excessive expansion and then contractions. The primary beneficiaries of these manipulations are the investment bankers who can sell stock they don't own going up and then pocket more profits by selling stock they don't own as prices go down.
I realize the danger you all face in Congress for resisting the Federal bank cartel. The czar was taken out, in part, because he resisted a central bank for Russian. So Russia got centralized everything as punishment. But if you all hang together, you will not hang. They will crawl back under the rocks from which they came.
Hopefully on the north shore of the Black Sea, but Russia will not take them back. I also point out that every Fed chairman in my long lifetime has been a Khazar, confounding the ethnic distribution pattern of even the white Wasp network.
Pushiness does not relate to integrity and true managerial ability and serving the broader public interest. Before you all rush to praise the Fed as a hero, I challenge you to abolish this enemy of the people before it kills the nation - and your anticipated pensions too.
If Congress truly wants to see a prosperous United States, and not just a component of an unmanageably large and unsustainable world government, I urge itto be intellectually honest and kill this beast spawned in secret on Jekyll Island by robber barons whose robbing and pillaging has gone on long enough.
Congressman Grayson was questioning a Fed Reserve woman a few days ago and she had no idea where the money went.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, and American leadership has been asleep for too long. I read the executive branch study a few years ago - was it LBJ - that stated a strong economy is a major component of national security. The central bank has weakened us once again. Andrew Jackson is rolling in his grave at Hermitage, Tennessee.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
A man told CNBC the other night that he made his bank credit card payment a day or two late -- and the bank immediately raised his interest rate from 11 percent to a punitive 29 percent.
He noted the payment had been late because the due date was on a Sunday and he thought he had a grace period.
But all across America banks have been routinely looking for any excuse to charge 29 percent interest rates - even to this guy who had been a loyal bank customer for 20 years.
The television advisor said he should have made his payment a week in advance and the banks are doing all they can to stay in business.
So when the TARP money is being given to the banks because they, in effect, are overdrawn and can’t make their payments, why aren’t taxpayers extracting the same ruthless 29 percent interest rate from the deadbeat banks?
I think by now every American should realize the banking system is primarily a control mechanism to keep the citizens in bondage.
Once again, I point out that the globalists have relentlessly pushed for wage deflation in the U. S. by shipping jobs overseas and then bringing in cheap foreign labor to drive down wages toward a global average.
So there is no way the U. S. banking system can survive - and neither can its customers afford 29 percent interest rates.
When consumers borrow $100,000 to buy a house the banking system only creates $100,000 -- often out of thin air -- to give to the seller. But the borrowers will have to pay back up to three times that amount over the life of the mortgage. To help accomplish that, the Federal Reserve Bank continually inflates money supply so that extra money is in circulation so workers can get inflation-driven wage increases and capture money from the system to pay back the interest as well as the principal owed.
The two trillion the Fed has created out of thin air to plug the black holes in the banking balance sheets will have to be paid back with interest presumably, so the taxpayers will have to pay back up six trillion dollars to the Fed over time, including the compound interest.
But wait, the globalists have been successful in busting wage inflation, commodity inflation - so why can’t Congress see that the system is clearly broken and cannot be fixed by just throwing fiat dollars at the disaster?
But even a simple minded Congress should see that 29 percent interest charges for bank customers should be levied on the banks as well. It is time to modify the bankers’ irresponsible behavioral patterns.
He noted the payment had been late because the due date was on a Sunday and he thought he had a grace period.
But all across America banks have been routinely looking for any excuse to charge 29 percent interest rates - even to this guy who had been a loyal bank customer for 20 years.
The television advisor said he should have made his payment a week in advance and the banks are doing all they can to stay in business.
So when the TARP money is being given to the banks because they, in effect, are overdrawn and can’t make their payments, why aren’t taxpayers extracting the same ruthless 29 percent interest rate from the deadbeat banks?
I think by now every American should realize the banking system is primarily a control mechanism to keep the citizens in bondage.
Once again, I point out that the globalists have relentlessly pushed for wage deflation in the U. S. by shipping jobs overseas and then bringing in cheap foreign labor to drive down wages toward a global average.
So there is no way the U. S. banking system can survive - and neither can its customers afford 29 percent interest rates.
When consumers borrow $100,000 to buy a house the banking system only creates $100,000 -- often out of thin air -- to give to the seller. But the borrowers will have to pay back up to three times that amount over the life of the mortgage. To help accomplish that, the Federal Reserve Bank continually inflates money supply so that extra money is in circulation so workers can get inflation-driven wage increases and capture money from the system to pay back the interest as well as the principal owed.
The two trillion the Fed has created out of thin air to plug the black holes in the banking balance sheets will have to be paid back with interest presumably, so the taxpayers will have to pay back up six trillion dollars to the Fed over time, including the compound interest.
But wait, the globalists have been successful in busting wage inflation, commodity inflation - so why can’t Congress see that the system is clearly broken and cannot be fixed by just throwing fiat dollars at the disaster?
But even a simple minded Congress should see that 29 percent interest charges for bank customers should be levied on the banks as well. It is time to modify the bankers’ irresponsible behavioral patterns.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
